Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-04-28 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1314 HB 181 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 181 "An Act relating to the obligations of spouses, to insurance policies of spouses, to the nonprobate transfer of property on death to a community property trust, to the division of the community property of spouses at death, and to the Alaska Community Property Act; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT FORTHCOMING CS(JUD) 3DP 2NR 1115 FN1: ZERO(LAW) 1116 CS(JUD) NT RECEIVED 1150 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 181(JUD) "An Act relating to the obligations of spouses, to insurance policies of spouses, to the nonprobate transfer of property on death to a community property trust, to the division of the community property of spouses at death, and to the Alaska Community Property Act; amending Rule 301, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 181(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 181(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 181(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-04-28 House Journal Page 1315 CSHB 181(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kookesh Absent: Bunde, Croft, Halcro, Kohring And so, CSHB 181(JUD) passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 181(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.